PayPal chief leaving for Facebook

Outgoing PayPal chief David Marcus, seen here in what would make for a nice Facebook pic.

NEW YORK (CNNMoney)

PayPal parent eBay (EBAY, Tech30) said Monday that Marcus, who was named president of the unit in April 2012, "has made a career decision to focus on what he loves most -- leading smaller teams to create great product experiences."

In his new role, Facebook said Marcus will "lead our efforts in mobile messaging."

"Messaging is a core part of Facebook's service and key to achieving our mission of making the world more open and connected," the company said. "We're excited by the potential to continue developing great new messaging experiences."

EBay shares slipped 2.6% in after-hours trading Monday following the announcement. Facebook (FB, Tech30) shares ticked up 0.5%.

Related: Amazon continues assault on PayPal

The move comes at a time when many analysts believe Facebook is poised to expand into the mobile payments business. The company is hoping to obtain regulatory approval for a mobile payments system in the United Kingdom, The Financial Times reported in April.

Facebook has also been active on the messaging front. It purchased mobile messaging app WhatsApp for a stunning $19 billion in February, and in April, it broke out its own messaging service into a standalone app.

Marcus' move to Facebook also comes on the same day that Amazon (AMZN, Tech30) launched a new service allowing customers to automatically pay recurring charges, such as monthly subscription fees or phone bills, using their Amazon log-in details. The new Amazon Payments feature will go head-to-head with PayPal.

First Published: June 9, 2014: 5:03 PM ET

10.21 | 0 komentar | Read More

GoDaddy files for $100 million IPO

GoDaddy is going public -- again. But its finances don't look pretty.

NEW YORK (CNNMoney)

But don't cue the celebratory racy Danica Patrick video just yet: In a filing with the Security and Exchange Commission on Monday, the website registration company offered an inside look at the company's hurting finances, and GoDaddy hasn't made a profit since 2009.

The company lost $279 million in 2012. It bled another $200 million last year. This year doesn't look much better, with another $51 million lost in the first quarter.

What's going on? The company's still recovering from a bad stretch. It was mired in debt back in 2011, when three private equity firms came to the rescue: KKR & Co. (KKR), Silver Lake Partners and Technology Crossover Ventures.

They reportedly paid $2.25 billion or so to buy a major stake in the company, according to The New York Times and Wall Street Journal.

Also, as part of the announcement, GoDaddy founder Bob Parsons said he is stepping down from his current position as executive chairman, though he'll remain on the board. He stepped down as CEO in 2011.

Related story: The story behind GoDaddy's 'I quit' ad

GoDaddy's SEC filing shows Parsons -- a controversial figure who's taken heat for shooting elephants and the company's sexually-themed commercials -- still owns 28% of the company directly. KKR and Silver Lake each own 28%. Technology Crossover Ventures has the smallest slice, with 12%.

On the bright side, the company is showing steady growth. Its customer base has been expanding at about 13% a year and reached at 11.6 million customers in 2013. Its total number of registered websites has also grown, reaching 1.4 million bookings that same year.

The company also sees business potential in selling the hundreds of new top-level domains (like .nyc and .bike) that will soon be available with the approval of the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers.

This is the second time GoDaddy has tried to go public. It went this route back in 2006, but then backed out when it didn't get the pricing it wanted.

This time around, the company plans to offer a yet-undetermined number of shares of common stock. And there's no word yet what the company ticker will be.

First Published: June 9, 2014: 5:39 PM ET

10.21 | 0 komentar | Read More

Chinese struggle to give away their riches

HONG KONG (CNNMoney)

Would-be donors have to navigate the country's fledgling non-profit sector, which suffers from a relative lack of trusted organizations, weak tax incentives and public concerns over transparency.

Philanthropy is also a new idea in China. Traditional values emphasize an individual's responsibility to family, so pursuing riches only to donate them to outsiders strikes some as odd.

Chinese gave an estimated $13 billion to charity in 2012, compared to $316 billion in the U.S. The country has around half a million non-profits, whereas the U.S. has about 1.5 million.

Anke Schrader, a China-based researcher at the Conference Board, said that China's position is not unusual for a developing country. While the U.S. has a long history of producing massively rich individuals, China didn't have a single billionaire just 10 years ago.

"Overall, it's still in its very early stages," she said. "Entrepreneurs are shifting their thinking from what I would say is a pure consideration of pure wealth accumulation to thinking about wealth distribution."

Related story: Alibaba founders fund mega charity ahead of IPO

Advocates are hopeful that a decision by Alibaba co-founder Jack Ma will encourage other billionaires to open their wallets. In April, Ma partnered with current Alibaba CEO Joe Tsai to establish charitable trusts that could be worth more than $3 billion.

"It will send a ripple effect through the community," said Dien Yuen, managing director of Kordant Philanthropy Advisors. "They're being proactive ... I think it will encourage more people to step up."

But growth in charitable giving will also require the government to make substantial changes to the tax code, and loosen its grip on civil society.

The central government has been at work for about a decade on a charity promotion law, but nothing official has materialized. The rules that do exist are thin, vague and sporadically enforced.

Just setting up a non-profit or NGO can be exceedingly difficult.

Related story: China's new richest man worth $22 billion

Charities are supposed to register with Beijing, and in many cases, submit to its control -- some of the biggest groups are joint partnerships with the government. The rules are opaque and applicants must complete a huge pile of paperwork.

As a result, many decide to skirt the law. Yuen estimates that more than 1 million charities in China are unregistered. The lack of transparency can make it hard for donors to pick a legitimate group, and some choose to set up their own private foundations in an effort to avoid swindlers.

Non-profits and donors also have to consider political circumstances -- advocating for free speech and human rights is off limits. More acceptable causes include the environment, rural education, poverty and support for migrant workers.

Most charitable donations in China are made by corporations, which accounted for 58% of total donations in 2012, according to the Conference Board.

Related story: Chinese billionaire buys 007's yacht maker

Corporate donations outstrip individual gifts, Yuen said, partly because there aren't strong tax incentives to give to charity. While the government does offer some tax breaks for charitable donations, it can be difficult to claim the deduction.

And since China doesn't have an inheritance tax, there isn't much impetus for the rich to reduce their heirs' tax bill by donating money.

Numerous scandals in recent years have only added to the distrust of charities. One state-run group, the Red Cross Society of China, is still working to rebuild public confidence after a supposed employee was caught posting photos of herself with expensive cars and extravagant accessories.

While China's Red Cross denied that the woman, Guo Meimei, was an employee, her posts led to widespread outrage in China and allegations of corruption.

The incident had a lasting effect on the group, which has also been accused of misappropriating funds earmarked for disaster relief following the massive 2008 earthquake in Sichuan.

"There was a huge backlash for years until this Jack Ma gift became public," said Yuen. "And suddenly, there is this whole positive movement again."

First Published: June 9, 2014: 10:27 PM ET

10.21 | 0 komentar | Read More

Where's the fear in the stock market?

NEW YORK (CNNMoney)

The CBOE volatility index, or VIX (VIX), measures investors' expectations for market volatility in the near term.

Often referred to as Wall Street's "fear gauge," the VIX fell last week to its lowest level since before the financial crisis struck.

On Friday, it dipped below 11 for the first time since February 2007. Consider that at this point last year, the index was oscillating between 15 to 17. In June 2009, the VIX was hovering around 30.

What does this mean?

The apparent lack of fear in the market could be a red flag. Stocks have been in a bull market for more than five years, and some worry that investors have become complacent.

In another sign of the bullish tone, CNNMoney's Fear & Greed index, which is based on the VIX and several other measures, is back above the level that indicates "extreme greed" in the market.

Related: The bull market at 5: Not old yet

But others argue that the mood is not as cavalier as it seems.

Dan Greenhaus, chief market strategist at BTIG, said the idea that investors are complacent is "utter and total nonsense." He says there's "no shortage of worries" among the clients of his brokerage firm.

Greenhaus said investors are concerned about Federal Reserve policy, sluggish economic growth and lackluster corporate earnings, to name a few.

In fact, traders are worried enough to be looking for ways to hedge the expected rise in volatility.

Joe Bell, senior equity analyst at Schaeffer's Investment Research, said investors have been stocking up on call options for the VIX, which are derivative contracts designed to pay off when the index rises.

"Yes, volatility is low," he said. "But it's not like no one is talking about how volatility is low -- and they're buying hedges."

Last week, the Dow Jones Industrial Average and the S&P 500 both hit fresh record highs after solid economic news on the jobs front and further stimulus measures from the European Central Bank.

The Dow is a mere 75 points from breaking the 17,000 level. It crossed the 16,000 marker late last year.

Related: Finally! Job market returns to 2008 peak

JJ Kinahan, chief derivatives strategist at TD Ameritrade, said it's not surprising to see the VIX at its current level given the stock market's recent performance.

"We are at all-time highs, so you would expect the VIX to be at the lower end of it's range," he said.

The steady move higher this year has encouraged more investors to put money to work in the stock market, which helps keep a lid on volatility.

In any case, the lull in the VIX may not last much longer.

This week brings the expiration of a slew of derivatives contract, a quarterly phenomenon known as quadruple witching, said Kinahan

"That's when you could see some pressure on the VIX," he said.

First Published: June 8, 2014: 2:57 PM ET

10.21 | 0 komentar | Read More

T-Mobile is at a crossroads, so is the U.S. wireless industry

T-Mobile CEO John Legere, speaking from inside the cover of a Trapper Keeper.

NEW YORK (CNNMoney)

Sprint (S) and T-Mobile (TMUS), are close to finalizing a $32 billion merger proposal, according to reports this week. If approved by regulators, the deal would unite the nation's third- and fourth-largest carriers into a combined entity with subscriber numbers comparable to industry leaders AT&T (T, Tech30) and Verizon (VZ, Tech30).

The rumored merger has generated skepticism from some industry observers who worry about the creation of another telecom behemoth. But both Sprint and T-Mobile have been losing money consistently, and they argue that they need to combine to take on their larger competitors.

T-Mobile has provided a strong argument for the virtues of competition in recent months. Since the beginning of last year, the company has been engaged in an aggressive marketing campaign dubbed its "uncarrier" strategy. The goal is to upend the mobile industry, and it's been doing that by eliminating contracts, dropping international roaming charges and offering to pay competitors' customers $650 to switch over.

The company is also investing heavily to upgrade its infrastructure and expand its high-speed 4G-LTE network.

Sprint, AT&T and Verizon have all cut prices in response to T-Mobile's campaign, and they have begun moving away from two-year contracts as well.

This is the scenario the Justice Department envisioned when it blocked AT&T from buying T-Mobile back in 2011, saying the deal "would eliminate the important price, quality, product variety, and innovation competition that an independent T‑Mobile brings to the marketplace."

Related: T-Mobile's record year comes at a cost

So far, T-Mobile's efforts have paid off in the form of increased market share. The company said last month that it added a record 2.4 million subscribers in the first three months of this year, its fourth consecutive quarter with over 1 million total net additions.

But these efforts have come at the cost of narrowing margins and widening losses. T-Mobile finished the first quarter with a loss of $151 million, up from $20 million in the last three months of 2013.

"They can't continue this forever because it will cost them too much money, so the question is what's next," said industry analyst Jeff Kagan.

Some analysts see the carrier's recent moves as an effort to boost its asking price in a potential acquisition. T-Mobile CEO John Legere said last month that consolidation in the industry was "a matter of when and not if," and that his company could benefit from the additional scale and assets a merger would offer.

Masayoshi Son, CEO of Sprint parent SoftBank, calls the U.S. wireless industry a duopoly, and says sustainable competition will emerge only with a third strong competitor.

Sprint and T-Mobile did not respond to requests for comment.

The merger proposal has yet to be officially announced, but antitrust officials already have a lot on their plates.

AT&T announced last month that it hopes to buy America's biggest satellite television provider, DirecTV (DTV), in a deal worth almost $50 billion. Comcast (CMCSA), meanwhile, is trying to acquire Time Warner Cable (TWC), a $45 billion deal that would create the country's dominant provider of television channels and Internet connections.

"So much is in flux," Kagan said. "The industry is changing, and regulators now have to look at it from a new perspective."

Akshay Sharma, an analyst with Gartner, said the Justice Department would likely look more favorably on Sprint's bid for T-Mobile than AT&T's failed effort from a few years ago, given Sprint's smaller size.

Should the deal fall through, T-Mobile could prove an attractive acquisition target for another big tech company like DISH Network (DISH) or an overseas carrier. What's clear is that neither T-Mobile nor Sprint can afford to maintain the status quo too much longer.

"It's innovate or die," Sharma said. "They just can't sit idle."

First Published: June 8, 2014: 3:01 PM ET

10.21 | 0 komentar | Read More

Obama expected to promise student loan relief

Who owes? See the status of student borrowing.

WASHINGTON (CNNMoney)

The official said Obama will expand the criteria for an alternative repayment program, which caps monthly payments for certain federal student loans at 10% of a borrower's discretionary income.

The changes would allow an additional 5 million borrowers to qualify and will be available beginning in December 2015, the official said.

The alternative payment programs are designed to help borrowers struggling under the weight of student loans. They include forgiveness programs for on-time payments and public-sector employees. Teachers can have their balance canceled after ten years, for example. Low-income borrowers can have their balance canceled after 20 or 25 years of on-time payments.

Borrowers who don't quality for forgiveness but use a repayment program find their monthly payments reduced but spread out over a longer period of time. That means they will pay more over the lifetime of the loan, as there is additional time for interest to accrue.

Income-based repayment and Pay As You Earn aren't available for borrowers who turn to private institutions rather than the government.

Related: Student loans will cost more this fall

The official said Obama will also voice support for a Democratic proposal on Capitol Hill that would allow borrowers to refinance their student loans. The proposal by Sen. Elizabeth Warren would extend current rates for new borrowers to those with outstanding loans at higher rates.

"While Congress decides what it's going to do, I will keep doing whatever I can without Congress to help responsible young people pay off their loans -- including new action I will take this week," Obama said in his weekly address on Saturday.

He was scheduled to make the announcement at a 1:45 p.m. event The New York Times first reported the news.

Student loans have been in the spotlight as the amount of debt skyrocketed, taking second place to only home mortgage debt, according to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.

On Tuesday, Obama is scheduled to discuss student loan debt and other education topics in a chat on the website Tumblr.

--CNN's Rachael Shackelford contributed to this report

First Published: June 8, 2014: 6:30 PM ET

10.21 | 0 komentar | Read More

77-year-old trader: How I made a lot of money

Paul Glandorf began investing seriously when he retired in his early 60s.

NEW YORK (CNNMoney)

At age 77, he is anything but a stereotypical Wall Street trader. He lives in Ohio and prefers casual "retiree clothing." (He put on a tie for this photo.) But his returns would make many top investors salivate.

He participated in an investing competition in 2013 where you had to buy five stocks on January 1 and hold them through the end of the year. His portfolio finished the year with a whopping 71% return.

Four of his picks -- LinkedIn (LNKD, Tech30), 3D Systems (DDD), Fidelity National (FNF) and Valeant Pharmaceuticals (VRX) -- did extremely well. Then there was Lululemon (LULU) -- the yoga apparel retailer whose shares sank more than 20%.

Glandorf took second place in the contest. And he still grumbles about Lululemon.

Learning to invest in retirement: For much of his life, Glandorf didn't have time to think about the stock market.

He was a pipe fitter who went on to start his own successful construction business in Cincinnati, Ohio.

But the closer he edged to retirement, the more he took an interest in how his funds were invested. He started to wonder if he could do better than some of the folks managing his money.

In his early 60s, Glandorf started a stock club. Fifteen people showed up to the first meeting at the pipe fitters' training school in Cincinnati.

"We called the club the Stock Wizards because the majority of the group were the exact opposite," Glandorf says. "You have to laugh at yourself in life."

The investing club is still going, although it now meets at a senior center. Glandorf has become something of a local stock prodigy.

Calling him the "Oracle of Ohio" -- a nod to famed investor Warren Buffett, the Oracle of Omaha -- might not be far off.

Related: Investors LOVE Warren Buffett

'Oracle of Ohio': Glandorf made a 57% return last year with his overall portfolio. So even though it was hard to lose money last year, it's still notable that he did much better than the S&P 500's 30% gain.

Since he took over managing and trading his own funds in 2001, he is clearly doing something right. Glandorf said that he typically invests about $10,000 each in a portfolio of about 75 to 80 stocks. So that means he is putting between $750,000 to $800,000 to work in the market.

"When I invest, I really look at the fundamentals and the technicals of a stock," he explains. "A lot of times I don't even know what the names of the companies are. I just know them by symbol."

His investing philosophy harkens back to his days as a small business owner. He knew he would have to investigate the competition.

The online stock research program MarketSmith is his bedrock. He prefers to buy stocks and hold them for awhile, but he logs on to the site every day to run several screens that generate about a dozen stocks that look good based on the various financial criteria he has developed.

Related: How I saved $1 million or more

Paul's list of stocks: The stocks that pop up on the screen make it into "Paul's list," an email that now goes out to many friends, family and past and current members of the Stock Wizards.

"We've got some fellas that short stocks and play options. The Wizards invest in many different ways. I only invest in one way: I invest in aggressive growth type stocks," he says.

"Usually 80% of my selections make money and 20% are losers," he says. That's been a pretty constant over time, except at the end of 2007.

Predicting the Great Recession: Perhaps his biggest accomplishment as an investor was recognizing America's great financial crisis. He made over 50% in 2007 and then got entirely out of the market, a rarity for him.

"I told everybody that I knew to sell their stocks at the end of 2007," he says. "I was positive the market was going to tank."

Glandorf stays pretty humble about his good fortune, noting that while he timed it right getting out of the market, it's tough to know when to jump back in.

Related: See the economy recovery in 17 charts

Some of the stocks he likes now include: Illumina (ILMN), Alexion Pharmaceuticals (ALXN), Actavis (ACT), and United Rentals (URI). All of these are up more than 20% this year with Illumina up over 50%.

He rattles off the tickers on the phone and conceded that he's not even sure what some of these companies do. But he knows their earnings history and forecasts and things like their price-to-earnings ratios.

Another rule of his: Always invest in equities or cash, no bonds.

The joy of his life these days -- besides his grandchildren -- is teaching others how to invest. While he tries to give advice, he lets people do what they think is best.

"I always tell people to only invest the amount of money they could afford to lose, although I don't think they'll lose much investing the way I do," he says proudly.

First Published: June 7, 2014: 8:05 AM ET

10.20 | 0 komentar | Read More

GM recalls 106,000 more vehicles

The 2012 Chevrolet Camaro is part of a new recall from GM.

NEW YORK (CNNMoney)

The automaker issued four more recalls Friday, adding 105,688 vehicles to the more than 15.8 million cars and trucks it has recalled worldwide this year.

The new recall affects about 36,000 vehicles including the 2012 Buick Verano, Chevrolet Camaro, Cruze and Sonic, which have a problem that can prevent the airbag from deploying in a crash. The flaw has been linked to one crash where someone suffered an injury.

A separate issue that could prevent the passenger airbag from deploying properly affects 87 Chevrolet Sparks from model years 2012 and 2014, as well as Buick Encores from model year 2013. Another airbag issue affects 37 Chevrolet Corvettes from model year 2014. Neither of those problems have been linked to a crash, the company said.

Related: GM deleted references to engines stalling

The largest, but less serious recall issued Friday affects 70,000 vehicles including some Chevrolet Silverado LD and HD models, as well as GMC Sierra LDs, Tahoes, Suburbans and Yukons from model years 2014 and 2015. They have a problem that could disable the audible chime that warns drivers and passengers that a front seat belt is not buckled or that the driver's door is opened while the key is in the ignition. GM is not aware of any crashes or injuries related to the issue. It affects

GM (GM) will send letters to customers letting them know when they can bring their vehicles into a dealership to be repaired.

The new recalls come one day after the company released an internal report examining why it took more than a decade to recall 2.6 million cars for a faulty ignition switch. That problem has been linked to at least 13 deaths. GM CEO Mary Barra announced that 15 employees have been dismissed and five more have been disciplined over the matter.

First Published: June 6, 2014: 4:57 PM ET

10.20 | 0 komentar | Read More

Lunch with Warren Buffett goes for $2.2 million

NEW YORK (CNNMoney)

Each year on eBay, Buffett auctions off an invitation to lunch. The proceeds go to GLIDE, a charity that runs a number of anti-poverty programs in San Francisco.

This year's winning bid, from a man from Singapore named Andy Chua, was more than double last year's of just over $1 million. The highest ever was in 2012, at $3.5 million.

Since the auction began 15 years ago, it has raised nearly $16 million for the organization.

Past winners include hedge fund manager David Einhorn, though most bidders remain anonymous. GLIDE did not provide more details about Chua.

Related: Buffett laughs at the 'persecuted' 1%

The winner will be allowed to invite up to seven friends to have lunch with Buffett at the New York City steakhouse Smith & Wollenksy.

GLIDE operates on a budget of about $18 million. It serves more than 850,000 free meals a year, offers affordable housing, and operates a health clinic in a city with one of the highest levels of inequality in the country.

"The demand keeps growing," said GLIDE founding president Janice Mirikitani. "In this area, the cost of living is very high and a lot of people can't afford to pay for both food and rent," she said.

Buffett is one of the world's leading philanthropists. He started The Giving Pledge in 2010, an effort that has signed up more than 100 billionaires around the globe. They have pledged to donate half of their net worth during their lifetime, or at their death.

Richest Americans in history

7 traits the rich have in common

First Published: June 7, 2014: 7:07 AM ET

10.20 | 0 komentar | Read More

Stephen Colbert gets nasty with Amazon

NEW YORK (CNNMoney)

Colbert took time Wednesday night on his Comedy Central show to say he was angry at Amazon for "deterring customers" from buying his books.

The comedian offered viewers stickers saying "I didn't buy it on Amazon" that they can download from his site.

Related: Amazon-Hachette feud: No end in sight

Colbert, whose publisher is Hachette, took Amazon (AMZN, Tech30) to task for what Hachette has said is Amazon's slow restocking of some of its books. Hachette says it's causing "available in 2-4 weeks" messages to appear on titles by Colbert, Malcolm Gladwell, novelist James Patterson, and others.

Some of Hachette's books have been listed as "out of stock", and recently Amazon removed preorder capabilities for some books, according to Hachette.

Amazon has reportedly been pressuring Hachette to let it lower prices for e-books and ultimately pay Hachette less for them. Hachette has resisted.

In statement last week about the apparent log-jam Amazon said, "Unfortunately, despite much work from both sides, we have been unable to reach mutually-acceptable agreement on terms."

Related: 8 books Amazon is making it hard to buy

And it doesn't seem like there's an end in sight to the tiff.

Amazon raised eyebrows last week saying that if customers are inconvenienced by its battle with the book publisher, they should buy Hachette's books elsewhere.

Related: The future of media with Brian Stelter

Amazon is the biggest name in book selling and sets the tone for book sales and publishers. Since Amazon is so powerful, publishers often have little choice but to accept Amazon's terms.

First Published: June 5, 2014: 1:46 PM ET

10.20 | 0 komentar | Read More